Green Innovations in Energetic Materials: Sustainable Alternatives and Their Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37628/ijem.v9i2.1076Abstract
Traditional energetic materials, such as trinitrotoluene (TNT) and ammonium nitrate, have been the backbone of explosives, propellants, and pyrotechnics for over a century. Despite their effectiveness, these materials pose significant environmental and health risks due to their toxicity, pollution potential, and long-term environmental persistence. This paper explores the latest innovations and applications of eco-friendly alternatives to traditional energetic materials. Key areas of focus include the development of nitrogen-rich compounds, bio-based materials, and ionic liquids, which offer reduced toxicity, lower environmental impact, and improved safety profiles. Nitrogen-rich compounds, such as tetrazoles and triazoles, demonstrate high energy densities and reduced production of harmful byproducts. Bio-based materials, derived from renewable resources like cellulose and chitosan, provide biodegradable and less toxic options for energetic applications. Ionic liquids, with their tunable properties, present versatile and less volatile alternatives to conventional solvents and binders in energetic formulations. The study also examines the practical applications of these green energetic materials in military, mining, and aerospace industries, highlighting their performance, benefits, and potential challenges. Case studies of successful implementation and ongoing research projects are presented to illustrate the feasibility and impact of these innovations. In conclusion, the transition to eco-friendly energetic materials is not only feasible but also essential for reducing the environmental footprint of energetic material usage. This paper underscores the importance of sustainable practices in the energetic materials industry and envisions a future where environmental stewardship and high-performance materials go hand in hand.
References
Direct CO2 Intensity of Cement Production in the Net Zero Scenario, 2015–2030. 2021. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/cement (accessed on 21 December 2022).
Farooq, F.; Jin, X.; Faisal Javed, M.; Akbar, A.; Izhar Shah, M.; Aslam, F.; Alyousef, R. Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 306, 124762.
Carreño-Gallardo, C.; Tejeda-Ochoa, A.; Perez-Ordonez, O.I.; Ledezma-Sillas, J.E.; Lardizabal-Gutierrez, D.; Prieto-Gomez, C.; Valenzuela-Grado, J.A.; Hernandez, F.R.; Herrera-Ramirez, J.M. In the CO2 emission remediation by means of alternative geopolymers as substitutes for cements. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4878–4884.
Negahban, E. Investigation of Geopolymer Concrete for Pavement Applications; Swinburne University of Technology: Melbourne, Australia, 2022.
ICR. Global Cement Report, 13th ed.; CemNet: Dorking, UK; International Cement Review: Dorking, UK, 2019
Alam, O.; Qiao, X. An in-depth review on municipal solid waste management, treatment and disposal in Bangladesh. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101775.
Patwa, A.; Parde, D.; Dohare, D.; Vijay, R.; Kumar, R. Solid waste characterization and treatment technologies in rural areas: An Indian and international review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101066.
Pacewska, B.; Wilińska, I. Usage of supplementary cementitious materials: Advantages and limitations. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020, 142, 371–393.
Fantilli, A.P.; Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka, D. Special Issue: Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Concrete, Part I. Materials 2021, 14, 2291.
Amin, A. Application of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Precast Concrete Industry. In Sustainability of Concrete with Synthetic and Recycled Aggregates; Hosam, M.S., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2021; Chapter 8
Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Xiao, R.; Guo, F.; Bai, Y.; Huang, B. Influence of size effect on the properties of slag and waste glass-based geopolymer paste. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 383, 135428.
Xiao, R.; Huang, B.; Zhou, H.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, X. A state-of-the-art review of crushed urban waste glass used in OPC and AAMs (geopolymer): Progress and challenges. Clean. Mater. 2022, 4, 100083.
Jiang, X.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, M.; Hu, W.; Bai, Y.; Huang, B. A laboratory investigation of steel to fly ash-based geopolymer paste bonding behavior after exposure to elevated temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 254, 119267.
Zhang, H.Y.; Qiu, G.H.; Kodur, V.; Yuan, Z.S. Spalling behavior of metakaolin-fly ash based geopolymer concrete under elevated temperature exposure. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 106, 103483.
de Oliveira, L.B.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Marvila, M.T.; Pereira, E.C.; Fediuk, R.; Vieira, C.M.F. Durability of geopolymers with industrial waste. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00839.
Unis Ahmed, H.; Mahmood, L.J.; Muhammad, M.A.; Faraj, R.H.; Qaidi, S.M.A.; Hamah Sor, N.; Mohammed, A.S.; Mohammed, A.A. Geopolymer concrete as a cleaner construction material: An overview on materials and structural performances. Clean. Mater. 2022, 5, 100111.
Singh, N.B.; Middendorf, B. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 237, 117455.
Agrawal, J. P. (2010). High Energy Materials: Propellants, Explosives and Pyrotechnics. Wiley-VCH.
Fu, C.; Ye, H.; Zhu, K.; Fang, D.; Zhou, J. Alkali cation effects on chloride binding of alkali-activated fly ash and metakaolin geopolymers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 114, 103721.
Ranjbar, N.; Kuenzel, C.; Spangenberg, J.; Mehrali, M. Hardening evolution of geopolymers from setting to equilibrium: A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 114, 103729.
