Comparative Analysis of Characterization Techniques for Nanomaterial: Strengths and Limitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37628/ijnn.v8i2.943Abstract
Nanomaterials have become extremely popular in numerous fields because of their exceptional properties and potential applications. However, characterizing these materials can be challenging due to their minute size and substantial surface area. Over the years, various characterization techniques have been developed to understand the physical, chemical, and structural properties of nanomaterials. In this review, we compare and analyze the strengths and limitations of commonly used characterization techniques for nanomaterials. Several techniques are employed for characterizing nanomaterials, including X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, dynamic light scattering, and Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy, among others. Each technique is evaluated based on its ability to provide information on the size, morphology, crystal structure, surface area, and chemical composition of nanomaterials. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are analyzed, along with their practical implications, including cost and availability. The review also highlights the importance of using multiple characterization techniques in combination to obtain a comprehensive understanding of nanomaterials. Finally, we provide a roadmap for selecting the most appropriate characterization technique(s) for a given nanomaterial, based on its specific properties and research questions. Overall, this review provides a valuable resource for researchers in the field of nanotechnology, guiding them in choosing appropriate characterization techniques to advance their understanding of nanomaterials and facilitate their practical applications.References
Ali, M. A., Mohamed, A. M., El-Gendy, A. A., Ebeid, E. M., & Saleh, T. A. (2021). Comparative
analysis of different characterization techniques for metallic nanoparticles. Journal of
Nanoparticle Research, 23(1), 1-24.
Arora, S., Gupta, A., & Rathi, P. (2017). Nanomaterials: A review of the characterization,
properties, and applications. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 5(3), 63-
Chen, L., & Huang, Y. (2017). Characterization of nanomaterials: A review of the methods and
applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 316, 743-762.
Cullity, B. D., & Stock, S. R. (2001). Elements of X-ray diffraction. Prentice Hall.
Hirsch, A. (2002). The era of carbon allotropes. Nature, 418(6898), 591-593.
Kneipp, K., Kneipp, H., Itzkan, I., Dasari, R. R., & Feld, M. S. (1999). Surface-enhanced Raman
scattering and biophysics. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 11(10), R239.
Lasič, S., & Rupnik, M. S. (2016). Dynamic light scattering for particle sizing in medicine: An
overview of theory and applications. Radiology and Oncology, 50(3), 277-298.
Morsali, A., & Nasiri Sarvi, M. (2018). An overview of characterization methods of
nanomaterials. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE), 37(4), 1-16.
Singh, A. K., & Sahoo, A. (2019). Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: A review.
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 19(11), 6680-6699.
Venkatachalam, N., Palanisamy, S., Das, S. K., & Ahmed, M. U. (2019). Advanced
characterization techniques for nanoparticles: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 18, 3764-
Singh DK, Prajapat P, Saroha J, Pant RK, Sharma SN, Nanda KK, Krupanidhi SB, Gupta G.
Photocurrent Polarity Switching and Enhanced Photoresponse in Silver Nanoparticles Decorated
a-GaN-Based Photodetector. ACS Applied Electronic Materials. 2023 Feb 22.