Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Performance Evaluation of the Power Cartridge in the Closed Vessel for Water-Jet Application

Bhupesh Ambadas Parate, V K Dixit, V V Rao

Abstract


The power cartridges are generally called as gas generator devices utilized in disruptor system to generate a high velocity water jet. This high velocity water-jet helps in the damage of suspected improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The closed vessel (CV) methodology for performance evaluation in respect of the power cartridge is explained in this research paper. To determine the performance, the CV is fabricated. The gas pressure generated by the power cartridge is measured using the pressure sensor fitted to the CV body. It is one of the methodologies to measure the internal pressure inside the CV. The scope of this study is to generate the maximum pressure and time for maximum pressure by burning a single base (SB) propellant and double base (DB) propellants at the different temperatures. An experimental study involves a burning of known mass of the propellant in the CV at hot, cold and ambient temperatures. SB propellant and DB propellants with 3g mass and 0.5 g pyrotechnic composition each are used in the CV firings. Experimental results show that the maximum pressure (Pmax) in hot is more than that of cold and ambient temperature, whereas time for maximum pressure is less in hot than that of cold and ambient temperature for both SB and DB propellants. This paper presents an experimental findings carried out for the performance assessment of various parameters using data acquisition system (DAS). The statistical data are evaluated for the cartridge at hot, cold and ambient temperatures. The percentage error between experiment and theoretical pressure is 2.41% for SB propellant and DB propellants 17.35%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Suzon KOC, Mehmet Ali AK, Hiiseyin V. Characterization of Power Cartridges, an experimental & numerical approach. American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. 1999; AIAA-99-2421.

Parate BA, Sahu AK, Ghodke CB, et al. Design, Development, Testing & Performance Evaluation of Propellant Actuated Device to operate Harness System for Aircraft Application. Proceedings of 10th International. 2016; 1091-1101.

Hunt CFRW. Internal Ballistics. London. HMSO; 1950.

Corner J. Theory of the interior ballistics of guns. New York. John. Wiley; 1950.

Woodley C, Henning P, Cox K. Burning rates of polymer-bonded Explosives. International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion. 2014; 13(6): 495–516.

Smith JM. Burning rates of solid propellants. A I Ch E Journal. 1960; 6(2): 299-304.

Agrawal JP. High Energy Materials. Propellants, Explosives & Pyrotechnics. Wiley-VCH; 2010.

Yilmaz N, Donaldson B, Gill W, et al. Solid propellant burning rate from strand burner pressure measurement. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics. 2008; 33(2): 109-117.

Leciejewski KZ. Comparative Closed Vessel tests -Influence of ignition and loading conditions on propellant burning rate. Military University of Technology, faculty of mechatronics & aerospace. 2011; 3: 57-63.

NATO STANAG 4115. Definition and determination of ballistic properties of Gun Propellants. 2nd Ed. North Atlantic Council; 1997.

Mehta P, Shetty CP, Pundkar RN, et al. Closed vessel firing of gun propellant at different loading densities. Def. Sci. J. 2015; 65(2): 126-130.

Jakub M, Zbigniew L. Closed Vessel Investigation of Propellant Ignition Process with Using Capillary Plasma Generator. Problems of Mechatronics. Armament, Aviation, Safety Engineering. 2015; 6(1): 19-26.

Divekar CN, Khire V, Mahore B, et al. Studies on Web Size Variation of Double Base Gun Propellants on Closed Vessel (CV) Results, 8th International High Energy Materials Conference & Exhibit; 2011.

Bin XU, San-jiu Y, Xin LIAO. Calculation of propellant gas pressure by simple extended corresponding state principle. Defence Technology. 2016; 12: 66-89.

Norbert E, Fischer TS, Langer G, et al. Burn Rate Models for Gun Propellants. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics. 2002; 27: 142-149.

ERDL/GP/PS/180- Specification to govern manufacture and inspection of single base chopped propellant NC / C 018; 1991.

JSS: 1376-12: Joint Services Specification on Double Base Propellants, Directorate of Standardisation, New Delhi; 2003.

Langston SB, McGuigan SJ, Bellerby JM, et al. A new closed vessel for determining the ballistic performance of high energy solid and liquid gun propellants. Jr. of Energetic Material. 2006; 18(4): 311-330.

Vittal D. Application of closed vessel technique for evaluation of burning rates of propellant at low pressure. Def. Sci. J. 1977; 27: 83-88.

Vittal D. Use of Closed Vessel as a constant pressure apparatus for the measurement of the rate of burning propellants. Def. Sci. J. 1980; 30: 69-74.

Hu S, Chen J, Wu G, et al. Burning Behavior of Solid Propellants at High Pressure. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2014; 186: 1858-1888.

Parate BA, Kulkarni CM. Estimation of heat loss in a Closed Vessel. Def. Sci. J. 2007; 57(2): 223-228.

Kulkarni UP, Naik SD. Modelling of Heat Loss in Closed Vessels during Propellant burning. Def. Sci. J. 2000; 50(4): 401-409.

de Oliveira JLSP, Filho AAMF, Platt GM, et al. Estimation of ballistic parameters of gun propellants through closed vessel experiment modelling. Thermal Engineering. 2005; 4(1): 50-55.

De Oliveira JLSP, Filho AAMF, Platt GM, et al. Modeling of Closed-Vessel Experiments and Ballistic Parameter Estimation. Energetic Materials. 2005; 23: 59–73.

Parate B A, Deodhar KD and Dixit VK. Qualification testing, evaluation and test methods of gas generator for IEDs applications. Def. Sci. J,. 2021; Vol. 71(4): 462-469

Fu-ming XU. On the definition of propellant force. Defence Technology. 2013; 9: 127-130.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.