Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Action Potential Monitoring Using Neuronanorobots: Neuroelectric Nanosensors

Nuno R B Martins, Wolfram Erlhagen, Robert A. Freitas Jr


Neuronanorobotics, a key future medical technology that can enable the preservation of human brain information, requires appropriate nanosensors. Action potentials encode the most resource-intensive functional brain data. This paper presents a theoretical design for electrical nanosensors intended for use in neuronanorobots to provide non-destructive, in vivo, continuous, real-time, single-spike monitoring of action potentials initiated and processed within the ~86 x 109 neurons of the human brain as intermediated through the ~2.4 x 1014 human brain synapses. The proposed ~3375 nm3 FET-based neuroelectric nanosensors could detect action potentials with a temporal resolution of at least 0.1 ms, enough for waveform characterization even at the highest human neuron firing rates of 800 Hz. Keywords: Human brain information, nanorobot, nanorobotics, neuronanorobot, neuronanorobotics

Full Text:



Azevedo F.A., et al. Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J Comp Neurol. 2009; 513(5):532–41p.

Martins N.R.B., Erlhagen, W., Freitas, R.A. Jr. Non-destructive whole-brain monitoring using nanorobots: Neural electrical data rate requirements. Intl. J. Machine Consciousness. 2012; 4:109–40p.

IBM (2008) IBM Seeks to Build the Computer of the Future Based on Insights from the Brain. IBM News Room. 20 Nov 2008.


Wilson H.R. Simplifed Dynamics of Human and Mammalian Neocortical Neurons. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1999; 200 (4): 375–88p.

Contreras, D. (2004) Electrophysiological classes of neocortical neurons. Neural Networks 2004; 17(5–6) 633–46p.

Naundorf B., et al. Unique features of action potential initiation in cortical neurons. Nature 2006; 440: 1060–3p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Nanomedicine, Volume I: Basic Capabilities. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX. 1999.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Exploratory Design in Medical Nanotechnology: A Mechanical Artificial Red Cell. Artif. Cells, Blood Subst., and Immobil. Biotech. 1998; 26:411–30p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Nanomedicine, Volume IIA: Biocompatibility. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX. 2003.

Morris K. Macrodoctor, come meet the nanodoctors. Lancet. 2001; 357: 778p.

Astier Y., et al. Protein components for nanodevices. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2005; 9(6): 576–84p.

Patel G.M., et al. Nanorobot: A versatile tool in nanomedicine. Journal of Drug Targeting. 2006; 14(2): 63–7p.

Park H.H., et al. Rise of the nanomachine: The evolution of a revolution in medicine. Nanomedicine 2007; 2(4): 425–39p.

Popov A.M., et al. Biocompatibility and applications of carbon nanotubes in medical nanorobots. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2007; 2(3): 361–72p.

Martel S., et al. Flagellated magnetotactic bacteria as controlled MRI-trackable propulsion and steering systems for medical nanorobots operating in the human microvasculature. International Journal of Robotics Research. 2009; 28(4): 571–582p.

Mallouk T.E., Sen, A. Powering nanorobots. Scientific American 2009; 300(5): 72–77p.

Kostarelos K.Nanorobots for medicine: How close are we? Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010; 5(3):341–2p.

Mavroides D., Ferreira A. NanoRobotics: Current Approaches and Techniques. Springer, New York. 2011.

Freitas R.A. Progress in Nanomedicine and Medical Nanorobotics. Rieth M, Schommers W, eds., Handbook of Theoretical and Computational Nanotechnology, 6 (Bioinformatics, Nanomedicine, and Drug Design), American Scientific Publishers, Stevenson Ranch, CA; (2006a); 619–72p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Comprehensive Nanorobotic Control of Human Morbidity and Aging. in Fahy, G.M., et al. The Future of Aging: Pathways to Human Life Extension, Springer, New York. 2010; 685–805p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Clottocytes: artificial mechanical platelets. Institute for Molecular Manufacturing; Report No. 18, June 2000.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Nanodentistry. J. Amer. Dent. Assoc. 2000b; 131: 1559–66p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Microbivores: Artificial Mechanical Phagocytes using Digest and Discharge Protocol. J. Evol. Technol. 2005; 14(Apr):1–52p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Pharmacytes: An Ideal Vehicle for Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006: 2769–75p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. The Ideal Gene Delivery Vector: Chromallocytes, Cell Repair Nanorobots for Chromosome Replacement Therapy. J. Evol. Technol. 2007; 16: 1–97p.

Gorelik J. Ion channels in small cells and subcellular structures can be studied with a smart patch-clamp system. Biophys J. 2002; 83(6):3296–303p.

Freitas R.A. Jr., Phoenix, C.J. (2002). Vasculoid: A personal nanomedical appliance to replace human blood. J. Evol. Technol. 11(April):1–139p.

Sporns O., et al. The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain. PLoS Comput Biol 2005; 1(4).

Lu J.Q., (2009) 3-D hyperintegration and packaging technologies for micro-nano systems. Proc. IEEE. 2009; 97(1): 18–30p.

Anderson J.R., et al. The Viking viewer for connectomics: scalable multi-user annotation and summarization of large volume data sets. J Microscopy: 2011; 241: 13–28p.

Kleinfeld D., et al. Large-scale automated histology in the pursuit of connectomes. Journal of Neuroscience 2011; 31(45), 16,125–38p.

Seung H. S. Neuroscience: Towards functional connectomics. Nature. 2011; 471, 170–172p.

Seo D., et al. Neural Dust: An Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution for Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces. arXiv, 2013,

Hogg T., Sretavan D.W. Controlling tiny multi-scale robots for nerve repair. In Proc. of the 20th Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), 2005; 1286–91p.

Hogg T., Coordinating Microscopic Robots in Viscous Fluids. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 2007; 14: 271–305p.

Freitas R.A. Jr. Computational Tasks in Medical Nanorobotics. Eshaghian-Wilner MM, ed., Bio-inspired and Nano-scale Integrated Computing. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 2009; 391–428p.

Freitas R.A. Jr., Merkle R.C. Nanofactory Collaboration. June 2006.

Freitas R.A. Jr., Merkle R.C. Kinematic Self-Replicating Machines. Landes Bioscience. Georgetown, TX. 2004.

Freitas R.A., Mavroidis, C., Ferreira A. NanoRobotics: Current Approaches and Techniques. Springer. 2013.

Kandel E.R., et al. Principles of Neural Science. New York. 4 Edn McGraw Hill. 2000.

Johnson, G.A., et al. Waxholm Space: An image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. NeuroImage, 2010; 53(2): 365p.

Fiala J.C., Harris K.M. Extending unbiased stereology of brain ultrastructure to three-dimensional volumes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Jan-Feb; 8(1):1–16p.

Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2012, August 20). High-definition fiber tractography is major advance in brain imaging. Science Daily. Retrieved July 4, 2013, from /releases/2012/08/120820121050.htm.

Fernandez-Miranda, J.C., et al. High-definition fiber tractography of the human brain: neuroanatomical validation and neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery. 2012 Aug; 71(2):430–53p.

General Electric Phoenix Nanoatom S. 2013.


Tkachuk A, et al. X-ray computed tomography in Zernike phase contrast mode at 8 keV with 50 nm resolution using Cu rotation anode X-ray source. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie. 2007; 222(11) 650–5p.

Biswal, B.B., et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010; 107(10): 4734–40p.

Nishimoto S., et al. Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology. 2011; 21: 1641–6p.

Hayworth K.J., et al. Automating the collection of ultrathin serial sections for large volume TEM reconstructions. Microscopy and Microanalysis 2006; 12 (Suppl 2): 86–7p.

Anderson J. M., et al. Physiology and Function of the Tight Junction. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2009; 1(2), 2584p.

Hayworth K.J. Electron imaging technology for whole brain neural circuit mapping; International Journal of Machine Consciousness. 2012; 4(1):87–108p.

Helmstaedter M., et al. High-accuracy neurite reconstruction for high-throughput neuroanatomy. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14:1081–8p.

Livet J., et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 2007; 450 (7166): 56–62p.

Lichtman J., et al. A technicolour approach to the connectome. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2008; 9 (6): 417–422p.

Zador A.M., et al. Sequencing the Connectome. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10(10): e1001411p.

Withers P.J. X-ray nanotomography, Materials today. 2007; 10(12): 26–34p.

Helmholtz Association New microscope reveals ultrastructure of cells. Public Release: 19 Nov 2010

Bock D.D., et al. Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons. Nature. 2011;471:177–82p.

Allen Brain Atlas. Website: ©2014 Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Human Brain Atlas.

Available from:

Hawrylycz M.J. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature. 2012; 489, 391–9p.

Allen Mouse Atlas. Website: ©2013 Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas. Available from:

Chung K., Deisseroth, K. CLARITY for mapping the nervous system. Nature Methods.2013; 10(6), 508–513p.

Chung K., et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems; Nature 2013; 497: 332–337p.

White, J.G., et al. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1986; 314: 1–340p.

Cheng D., et al. Relative and Absolute Quantification of Postsynaptic Density Proteome Isolated from Rat Forebrain and Cerebellum. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2006; 5:1158–70p.

Varshney L.R., et al. Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network, PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 February; 7(2).

Bumbarger D.J., et al. System-wide Rewiring Underlies Behavioral Differences in Predatory and Bacterial-Feeding Nematodes. Cell. 2013; 152(1): 109–19p.

Kaynig V., et al. Large-Scale Automatic Reconstruction of Neuronal Processes from Electron Microscopy. Medical image analysis. 2013; 16(1).

Amunts K., et al. BigBrain: An Ultrahigh-Resolution 3D Human Brain. Model Science. June 2013; 340(6139): 1472–5p.

OCP -Open Connectome Project. 2014. Website:

Black J.E., et al. Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 5568–72p.

Bliss, T.V., et al. Collingridge A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1993; 361: 31–39p.

Kandel E.R. The molecular biology of memory storage: A dialogue between gene and synapses. Science. 2001; 294(5544): 1030–8p.

Liu X., et al. Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature. 2012; 484, 381–385.

Fuhrmann G., et al. Coding of Temporal Information by Activity-Dependent Synapses The Journal of Neurophysiology. January 2002; 87(1): 140–8p.

Rollenhagen A., Lübke J.H.R. The morphology of excitatory central synapses: from structure to function, Cell Tissue Res. 2006; 326: 221–37p.

Rollenhagen A., et al. Structural determinants of transmission at large hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. J. Neurosci. 2007; 26; 27(39): 10434–44p.

Sabatini B.L., Regehr W.G. Timing of neurotransmission at fast synapses in the mammalian brain. Nature. 1996; 384:170–2p.

Südhof T.C. The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004; 27: 509–47p.

Polavieja G. G., et al. Stimulus History Reliably Shapes Action Potential Waveforms of Cortical Neurons. J Neurosci. 2005 Jun 8; 25(23):5657–65p.

Kole M.H., et al. Action potential generation requires a high sodium channel density in the axon initial segment. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 178–86p.

Sanford L. He axon hillock and the initial segment; The Journal of Cell Biology, 1968; 38, 193–201p.

Palmer, L.M., Stuart, G.J. Site of Action Potential Initiation in Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, February 8, 2006, 26(6):1854–63p.

Colbert, C.M., et al. Axonal Action-Potential Initiation and Na+ Channel Densities in the Soma and Axon Initial Segment of Subicular Pyramidal Neurons. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(21): 6676–86p.

Clark B.A., et al. The site of action potential initiation in cerebellar purkinje neurone. Nature Neuroscience. 2005; 8: 137–9p.

Connors B.W., Gutnick, M.J. (). Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends in Neuroscience. 1990; 13(3), 99–104p.

Tateno T., et al. Threshold Firing Frequency–Current Relationships of Neurons in Rat Somatosensory Cortex: Type 1 and Type 2 Dynamics; JN Physiol. 2004; 92(4): 2283–94p.

Steriade M. Neocortical Cell Classes Are Flexible Entities. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004; 5: 121–134p.

Steriade M., et al. Dynamic properties of corticothalamic neurons and local cortical interneurons generating fast rhythmic (30-40 Hz) spike burst. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998; 79(1), 483–490p.

Wang X. J. Fast burst firing and short-term synaptic plasticity: A model of neocortical chattering neurons. Neuroscience. 1999; 89(2):347–62p.

Rubel E.W., Parks, T.N. Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris. J Comp Neurol. 1975; 164:411–33p.

Berry M.J., et al. Refractoriness and neural precision. J Neurosci; 1998; 18 (6): 2200–11p.

VanRullen R., Thorpe S.J. Rate Coding vs Temporal Order Coding: What the Retinal Ganglion Cells tell the Visual Cortex. Neural Comput. 2001; 13(6): 1255–83p.

Kuznetsova M.S., et al. Adaptation of Firing Rate and Spike Timing Precision in the Avian Cochlear Nucleus; J Neurosci. 2008; 28(46): 1190615p.

Fields D.M., Weissburg M.J. Rapid firing rates from mechanosensory neurons in copepod antennules. J Comp Physiol A. 2004; 190: 877–82p. DOI 10.1007/s00359-004-0543-2.

Cressman J.R. Jr, et al. The influence of sodium and potassium dynamics on excitability, seizures, and the stability of persistent states: I. Single neuron dynamics. J Comput Neurosci. 2009; 26(2):159–70p.

Fettiplace R. et al. The thickness, composition and structure of some lipid bilayers and natural membranes. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 1971; 5(3): 277–296p.

Clever H.L. The Hydrated Hydronium Ion. J. Chem. Ed. 1963; 637–41p.

Israelachvili J.N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. Academic Press, NY. 2 Edn. 1992.

Lehr L., et al. Electron Solvation in Finite Systems: Femtosecond Dynamics of Iodide-(Water). Anion Clusters. Science. 23 April 1999; 284: 635–8p.

Dubach J. et al. Abstract 1879: Novel Intracellular Sodium Nanosensors to Study Sodium Dynamics in Cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2008; 118: 399p.

Berg H.C., et al. Physics of Chemoreception. Biophysical Journal 1977; (20):193–219p.

Li Y., Gregory S. Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1974 (38): 703–14p.

Gadani, D.H., et al. Effect of salinity on the dielectric properties of water. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2012; (50): 405–10p.

Nano Med Labs Nano Patch-Clamp (NPC): Development of a High-Throughput System Based On Planar Patch-Clamp. 15 July 2010. Website:

Electronic Bio Sciences. High performance single ion channel recordings at a low cost. 2013.


Novak P., et al. Nanoscale-Targeted Patch-Clamp Recordings of Functional Presynaptic Ion Channels. Neuron. 2013; 79: 1067–77p.

Electronic BioSciences. 2014. Website:

Veitinger S. The Patch-Clamp Technique: An Introduction. Website:

DeFelice L.J. Introduction to Membrane Noise. Plenum Press, New York. 1981.

Lauger P. Current noise generated by electrogenic ion pumps. Eur Biophys J. 1984; 11(2): 117–28p.

Hô N., Destexhe A. Synaptic background activity enhances the responsiveness of neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2000; 84, 1488p.

Li C., et al. Chaos in a three-neuron hysteresis hopfield-type neural networks. Physics Letters A, 2001; 285: 368–72p.

Gerstner W., Kistler W.M. Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity, Cambridge University Press. August 2002.

Brunetti, R., et al. Shot noise in single open ion channels: A computational approach based on atomistic simulations. Journal of Computational Electronics. 2007; 6(1): 391–394p.

Serletis D., et al. Complexity in neuronal noise depends on network interconnectivity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 39(6): 1768–78p.

Birn, R.M., () The role of physiological noise in resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2012; 62(2), 864–870p.doi: 10.1016/j. neuroimage. 2012.01.016.

Weaver J.C., Astumian R.D. The Response of Living Cells to Very Weak Electric Fields: The Thermal Noise Limit. Science. 1990; 247:459–62p.

Homes C. C., et al. Optical Response of High-Dielectric-Constant Perovskite-Related Oxide. Science. 27 July 2001; 293: 673–6p.

Gutman G.A., et al. Nomenclature and Molecular Relationships of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005; 57: 473–508p.

Kole M.H., et al. Axon Initial Segment Kv1 Channels Control Axonal Action Potential Waveform and Synaptic Efficacy. Neuron. 2007 Aug 16; 55(4):633–47p.

Colley B.S. et al. TRKB increases Kv1.3 ion channel half-life and surface expression; Neuroscience. 2007; 144(2): 531–46.

Smyth J.W., Shaw R.M. Forward trafficking of ion channels: What the clinician needs to know. Heart Rhythm. 2010; (8):1135–40p.

Angelides K.J. et al. Distribution and lateral mobility of voltage-dependent sodium channels in neurons. J. Cell Biol. 1988; 106: 1911–25p.

De Vittorio M. et al. Nanotechnology and Neuroscience: Nano-electronic-13 Photonic and Mechanical Neuronal Interfacing. Springer. 2014.

Cohen-Karni T., et al. Synthetically Encoded Ultrashort-Channel Nanowire Transistors for Fast, Pointlike Cellular Signal Detection. Nano Lett. 2012; 12; 2639−44p.

Tian B., et al. Three-dimensional, flexible nanoscale field-effect transistors as localized bioprobes. Science. 2010; 329(5993): 830–4p.

Chen K., et al. Silicon nanowire field-effect transistor-based biosensors for biomedical diagnosis and cellular recording investigation. Nano Today. 2011; 6(2): 131–54p.

Duan X., et al. Nanoelectronics Meets Biology: From New Nanoscale Devices for Live-Cell Recording to 3D Innervated Tissues; Chem. Asian J. 2013; 8: 2304–4p.

Shimada T., et al. Double-wall carbon nanotube field-effect transistors: Ambipolar transport characteristics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004; 84: 2412p.

Duan X., et al. Intracellular recordings of action potentials by an extracellular nanoscale field-effect transistor. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011; 7: 174–9p.

Cao D. et al. Electronic sensitivity of a single-walled carbon nanotube to internal electrolyte composition. Nanotechnology. 2012; 23(8): 85203p.

Yoon I., et al. Intracellular neural recording with pure carbon nanotube probes, PLoS One. 2013;8(6).

Aoki K., et al. Fabrication of glass-coated electrodes with nano and micrometer size by means of dissolution with HF. Electrochimica Acta. 2010; 55(24): 7328–33p.

Cox J.T., et al. Nanoelectrodes: Recent Advances and New Directions. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2012; 5: 253–72p.

Lambert N.J., et al. A charge parity ammeter, 2014 American Chemical Society, Nano Lett. 2014; 14, 1148−52p.

Fujisawa T. Bidirectional Counting of Single Electrons. Science. 2006; 312(5780): 1634–6p.

Park K., et al. Single Molecule Quantum Confined Stark Effect Measurements of Semiconductor Nanoparticles at Room Temperature. ACS Nano. 2012; 6: 10013–23p.

Tyner K. M., et al. Nanosized Voltmeter” Enables Cellular-Wide Electric Field Mapping. Biophysical Journal. 2007; 93(4), 1163–74p.

Dergan A. Electronic and transport properties of carbon nanotubes. University of Ljubljana. Faculty of Mathematics and Physics. 2010.

Uryu S. Electronic states and quantum transport in double-wall carbon nanotubes. Physical Review B. 2004; 69: 075402p.

Bacsa R.R. Narrow diameter double-wall carbon nanotubes: synthesis, electron microscopy and inelastic light scattering. New Journal of Physics. 2003; 5: 131.1–131.9p

Roman C., et al. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Sensor Concepts. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. 2010; 403–25p.

Nick C. et al. Three-Dimensional Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Extracellular Recording of Cardiac Myocytes. Biointerphases. 2012; 7(1–4): 58p.

Liu S., Guo X. Carbon nanomaterials field-effect-transistor-based biosensors. NPG Asia Materials. NPG Asia Materials. 2012; 4: e23p.

Lin C.M. Flexible carbon nanotubes electrode for neural recording. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009; 15; 24(9): 2791–7p.

Mehrabani, S., et al. Hybrid Integrated Label-Free Chemical and Biological Sensors. Sensors. 2014 ; 14 : 5890–928p.

Zhang Y. et al. Cytotoxicity Effects of Graphene and Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Neural Phaeochromocytoma-Derived PC12 Cells. ACS Nano. 2010; 4(6): 3181–6p.

Bosi S., et al. Carbon nanotubes: a promise for nerve tissue engineering? Nanotechnol Rev. 2013; 2(1): 47–57p.

Silva G.A. Shorting neurons with nanotubes. Nature Nanotechnology. 2009; 4, 82–3p.

Voge C.M., Stegemann J.P. Carbon nanotubes in neural interfacing applications. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8p.

Kim W., et al. Hysteresis Caused by Water Molecules in Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors, Nano Letters. 2003; 3(2):193–8p.


  • There are currently no refbacks.