Effects of Coupling Agent and Nanoclay on the Mechanical, Morphological and Dimensional Stability of Natural Fiber/Polypropylene Composites
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Sathishkumar T, Navaneethakrishnan P, et al. Characterization of natural fiber and composites-A review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2013;32:1457-1476.
Thakur VK, Thakur MK, et al. Raw natural fiber-based polymer composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization. 2014;19:256-271.
Ramamoorthy SK, Skrifvars M, et al. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: Plant, animal, and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polymer Reviews. 2015;55:107-162.
Zaman HU, Khan RA. Surface Modification of Plant-Drive Calotropis Gigantea Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Progress in Applied Science and Technology. 2020;12:23-35.
Zaman HU, Khan RA. Surface Modified Benzoylated Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Bast Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Advanced Journal of Science and Engineering. 2022;3:7-17.
Zaman HU, Khan RA, et al. The improvement ofphysicomechanical, flame retardant, and thermal properties of lignocellulosic material filled polymer composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2021:08927057211048535.
Prabhakar M, Shah AUR, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites reinforced with waste peanut shell powder as a bio-filler. Fibers and Polymers. 2015;16:1119-1124.
Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz J, et al. Surface modification and adhesion mechanisms in wood-fiber- polypropylene composites. Journal of Materials Science. 1999;34:6189-6199.
Rosa SM, Nachtigall S, et al. Thermal and dynamic-mechanical characterization of rice-husk filled polypropylene composites. Macromolecular Research. 2009;17:8-13.
Zaaba NF, Ismail H, et al. The effects of modifying peanut shell powder with polyvinyl alcohol on the properties of recycled polypropylene and peanut shell powder composites. BioResources.
;9:2128-2142.
Zaman HU, Khan RA. Acetylation is used for natural fiber/polymer composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2021;34:3-23.
Zaman HU, Beg M. Effect of coir fiber content and compatibilizer on the properties of unidirectional coir fiber/polypropylene composites. Fibers and Polymers. 2014;15:831-838.
Lai SM, Yeh FC, et al. Comparative study of maleated polyolefins as compatibilizers for polyethylene/wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;87:487-496.
Maldas D, Kokta B. Role of coupling agents on the performance of woodflour-filled polypropylene composites. International Journal of Polymeric Materials. 1994;27:77-88.
Beckermann G: Performance of hemp-fiber reinforced polypropylene composite materials. The University of Waikato; 2007.
Huang J, Keskkula H, et al. Comparison of the toughening behavior of nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide using various maleated elastomers. Polymer. 2006;47:639-651.
Oksman K, Lindberg H. Influence of thermoplastic elastomers on adhesion in polyethylene–wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;68:1845-1855.
Wilson K, Yang H, et al. Select metal adsorption by activated carbon made from peanut shells. Bioresource Technology. 2006;97:2266-2270.
Mohanty A, Misra Ma, et al. Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: An overview. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2000;276:1-24.
Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature. 2008;454:841-845.
Biswal M, Mohanty S, et al. Influence of organically modified nanoclay on the performance of pineapple leaf fiber‐reinforced polypropylene nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer
Science. 2009;114:4091-4103.
Rodríguez‐Llamazares S, Rivas BL, et al. The effect of clay type and clay-masterbatch product in the preparation of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2011;122:2013-2025.
Yeh SK, Gupta RK. Nanoclay‐reinforced, polypropylene‐based wood-plastic composites. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2010;50:2013-2020.
Ferreira J, Reis P, et al. A study of the mechanical properties on polypropylene enhanced by surface- treated nanoclays. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2011;42:1366-1372.
Li Q, Matuana LM. The surface of cellulosic materials modified with functionalized polyethylene coupling agents. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;88:278-286.
Oksman K, Clemons C. Mechanical properties and morphology of impact-modified polypropylene- wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;67:1503-1513.
Ishak ZM, Chow W, et al. Influence of SEBS-g-MA on morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of PA6/PP/organoclay nanocomposites. European Polymer Journal. 2008;44:1023-1039.
Cao XV, Ismail H, et al. Mechanical properties and water absorption of kenaf powder filled recycled high-density polyethylene/natural rubber biocomposites using MAPE as a compatibilizer. BioResources. 2011;6:3260-3271.
Catto AL, Stefani BV, et al. Influence of coupling agent in the compatibility of post-consumer HDPE in thermoplastic composites reinforced with eucalyptus fiber. Materials Research.
;17:203-209.
Nourbakhsh A, Baghlani FF, et al. Nano-SiO2 filled rice husk/polypropylene composites: Physico- mechanical properties. Industrial Crops and Products. 2011;33:183-187.
Alexandre B, Marais S, et al. Nanocomposite-based polyamide 12/montmorillonite: relationships between structures and transport properties. Desalination. 2006;199:164-166.
Deka BK, Maji T. Effect of coupling agent and nanoclay on properties of HDPE, LDPE, PP, PVC blend and Phargamites karka nanocomposite. Composites Science and Technology. 2010;70:1755-
Lee H, Kim DS. Preparation and physical properties of wood/polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2009;111:2769-2776.
Valente M, Sarasini F, et al. Hybrid recycled glass fiber/wood flour thermoplastic composites: Manufacturing and mechanical characterization. Composites Part A: Applied Science and
Manufacturing. 2011;42:649-657.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.