Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Effects of Coupling Agent and Nanoclay on the Mechanical, Morphological and Dimensional Stability of Natural Fiber/Polypropylene Composites

Haydar Zaman, Ruhul A. Khan

Abstract


Polymer nanocomposite is made up of polymer as a matrix ingredient and reinforcement ingredient as a filler in the form of nanometer particles. These ingredients have dissimilar physical and chemical features and are mixed to generate sole features of nanocomposites. Polypropylene (PP) was nominated as the polymer matrix ingredient. Reinforcement ingredients used include organically modified montmorillonite with natural fiber. Various composites based on polypropylene, natural fiber, and organically modified montmorillonite were manufactured by melt mixing method followed by injection molded in the presence and absence of coupling agents. The emphasis of this research is to assess the effects of chemical treatments (polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride and styrene ethylene-co-butylene styrene block copolymer grafted maleic anhydride) and the organically modified montmorillonite with natural fibers on the mechanical features, morphological, and dimensional stability of natural fiber- plastic composites made from PP. Adding polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride to natural fiber increased the tensile strength and impact strength of the natural fiber-plastic composite; but the tensile modulus stayed basically unchanged. On the contrary, the influence of styrene ethylene-co-butylene styrene block copolymer grafted maleic anhydride was a large effect on impact strength but the modulus was reduced in addition to a small effect on tensile strength. On adding both coupling agents to the natural fiber-plastic composite, the impact strength increased, but the tensile strength was not decreased. The inclusion of organically modified montmorillonite rises the tensile modulus of natural fiber-plastic composites without decreasing the impact strength, the use of three additives gives the possibility to create natural fiber-plastic composites with high modulus and high impact strength. Keywords Nanocomposite, nanoclay, natural fiber, polypropylene, coupling agents, mechanical properties

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sathishkumar T, Navaneethakrishnan P, et al. Characterization of natural fiber and composites-A review. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2013;32:1457-1476.

Thakur VK, Thakur MK, et al. Raw natural fiber-based polymer composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization. 2014;19:256-271.

Ramamoorthy SK, Skrifvars M, et al. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: Plant, animal, and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polymer Reviews. 2015;55:107-162.

Zaman HU, Khan RA. Surface Modification of Plant-Drive Calotropis Gigantea Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Progress in Applied Science and Technology. 2020;12:23-35.

Zaman HU, Khan RA. Surface Modified Benzoylated Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Bast Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Advanced Journal of Science and Engineering. 2022;3:7-17.

Zaman HU, Khan RA, et al. The improvement ofphysicomechanical, flame retardant, and thermal properties of lignocellulosic material filled polymer composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2021:08927057211048535.

Prabhakar M, Shah AUR, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites reinforced with waste peanut shell powder as a bio-filler. Fibers and Polymers. 2015;16:1119-1124.

Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz J, et al. Surface modification and adhesion mechanisms in wood-fiber- polypropylene composites. Journal of Materials Science. 1999;34:6189-6199.

Rosa SM, Nachtigall S, et al. Thermal and dynamic-mechanical characterization of rice-husk filled polypropylene composites. Macromolecular Research. 2009;17:8-13.

Zaaba NF, Ismail H, et al. The effects of modifying peanut shell powder with polyvinyl alcohol on the properties of recycled polypropylene and peanut shell powder composites. BioResources.

;9:2128-2142.

Zaman HU, Khan RA. Acetylation is used for natural fiber/polymer composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2021;34:3-23.

Zaman HU, Beg M. Effect of coir fiber content and compatibilizer on the properties of unidirectional coir fiber/polypropylene composites. Fibers and Polymers. 2014;15:831-838.

Lai SM, Yeh FC, et al. Comparative study of maleated polyolefins as compatibilizers for polyethylene/wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;87:487-496.

Maldas D, Kokta B. Role of coupling agents on the performance of woodflour-filled polypropylene composites. International Journal of Polymeric Materials. 1994;27:77-88.

Beckermann G: Performance of hemp-fiber reinforced polypropylene composite materials. The University of Waikato; 2007.

Huang J, Keskkula H, et al. Comparison of the toughening behavior of nylon 6 versus an amorphous polyamide using various maleated elastomers. Polymer. 2006;47:639-651.

Oksman K, Lindberg H. Influence of thermoplastic elastomers on adhesion in polyethylene–wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;68:1845-1855.

Wilson K, Yang H, et al. Select metal adsorption by activated carbon made from peanut shells. Bioresource Technology. 2006;97:2266-2270.

Mohanty A, Misra Ma, et al. Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: An overview. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2000;276:1-24.

Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature. 2008;454:841-845.

Biswal M, Mohanty S, et al. Influence of organically modified nanoclay on the performance of pineapple leaf fiber‐reinforced polypropylene nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer

Science. 2009;114:4091-4103.

Rodríguez‐Llamazares S, Rivas BL, et al. The effect of clay type and clay-masterbatch product in the preparation of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2011;122:2013-2025.

Yeh SK, Gupta RK. Nanoclay‐reinforced, polypropylene‐based wood-plastic composites. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2010;50:2013-2020.

Ferreira J, Reis P, et al. A study of the mechanical properties on polypropylene enhanced by surface- treated nanoclays. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2011;42:1366-1372.

Li Q, Matuana LM. The surface of cellulosic materials modified with functionalized polyethylene coupling agents. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2003;88:278-286.

Oksman K, Clemons C. Mechanical properties and morphology of impact-modified polypropylene- wood flour composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1998;67:1503-1513.

Ishak ZM, Chow W, et al. Influence of SEBS-g-MA on morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of PA6/PP/organoclay nanocomposites. European Polymer Journal. 2008;44:1023-1039.

Cao XV, Ismail H, et al. Mechanical properties and water absorption of kenaf powder filled recycled high-density polyethylene/natural rubber biocomposites using MAPE as a compatibilizer. BioResources. 2011;6:3260-3271.

Catto AL, Stefani BV, et al. Influence of coupling agent in the compatibility of post-consumer HDPE in thermoplastic composites reinforced with eucalyptus fiber. Materials Research.

;17:203-209.

Nourbakhsh A, Baghlani FF, et al. Nano-SiO2 filled rice husk/polypropylene composites: Physico- mechanical properties. Industrial Crops and Products. 2011;33:183-187.

Alexandre B, Marais S, et al. Nanocomposite-based polyamide 12/montmorillonite: relationships between structures and transport properties. Desalination. 2006;199:164-166.

Deka BK, Maji T. Effect of coupling agent and nanoclay on properties of HDPE, LDPE, PP, PVC blend and Phargamites karka nanocomposite. Composites Science and Technology. 2010;70:1755-

Lee H, Kim DS. Preparation and physical properties of wood/polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2009;111:2769-2776.

Valente M, Sarasini F, et al. Hybrid recycled glass fiber/wood flour thermoplastic composites: Manufacturing and mechanical characterization. Composites Part A: Applied Science and

Manufacturing. 2011;42:649-657.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.